# avideo vs timeoff-management-application

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | avideo | timeoff-management-application |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #4 of 9 in Human Resource Management (HRM) |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 ✓ | 1 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 ✓ | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

avideo scores 58/100 against 57/100 for timeoff-management-application, so it is the safer default.

avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for timeoff-management-application.

If you want the quickest setup, timeoff-management-application is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.

## Details

- [avideo](https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo.md)
- [timeoff-management-application](https://selfhost.directory/project/timeoff-management-application) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/timeoff-management-application.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/avideo-vs-timeoff-management-application