avideovsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
avideo scores 58/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
avideo is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with