avideovssolidtime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | solidtime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 | 9 056 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +128 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 20 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
solidtime scores 69/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
solidtime ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for avideo.
If you want the quickest setup, solidtime is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
solidtime is growing faster right now (+128 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →solidtime details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep solidtime, compare it with