avideovsSemaphore UI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | Semaphore UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 | 14 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +149 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 20 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Semaphore UI scores 73/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for avideo.
If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
Semaphore UI is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →Semaphore UI details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep Semaphore UI, compare it with