# avideo vs runitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | avideo | runitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #25 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 ✓ | 361 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.4.1-build.6 · 17 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | 0BSD |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

avideo scores 58/100 against 49/100 for runitor, so it is the safer default.

avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for runitor.

If you want the quickest setup, runitor is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.

avideo is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [avideo](https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo.md)
- [runitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/runitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/runitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/avideo-vs-runitor