# avideo vs Questarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | avideo | Questarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 ✓ | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

avideo scores 58/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.

avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.

avideo is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [avideo](https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo.md)
- [Questarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/avideo-vs-questarr