# avideo vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | avideo | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

avideo scores 58/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.

avideo is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [avideo](https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/avideo-vs-qm-music