avideovsQloApps
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | QloApps | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 | 14 452 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | OSL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
QloApps scores 68/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.
If you want the quickest setup, QloApps is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
QloApps is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →QloApps details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep QloApps, compare it with