# avideo vs qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | avideo | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 67/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 ✓ | 1 759 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +22 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 52 ✓ |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) scores 67/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for avideo.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [avideo](https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo.md)
- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/avideo-vs-qbittorrent-linuxserverio