avideovsPVE-UPS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | PVE-UPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #20 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 | 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 10 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v4.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
avideo scores 58/100 against 51/100 for PVE-UPS, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PVE-UPS.
If you want the quickest setup, PVE-UPS is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
avideo details →PVE-UPS details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep PVE-UPS, compare it with