# avideo vs Pulumi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | avideo | Pulumi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 25 829 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +30 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pulumi scores 78/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.

avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Pulumi.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulumi is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.

Pulumi is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [avideo](https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo.md)
- [Pulumi](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/avideo-vs-pulumi