# avideo vs Portainer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | avideo | Portainer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 38 736 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +187 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Zlib |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Portainer scores 77/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.

Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for avideo.

If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.

Portainer is growing faster right now (+187 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [avideo](https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/avideo.md)
- [Portainer](https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/avideo-vs-portainer