avideovspiclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | piclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #26 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 | 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 27 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.3.4 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
avideo scores 58/100 against 53/100 for piclaw, so it is the safer default.
piclaw ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for avideo.
If you want the quickest setup, piclaw is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
avideo is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →piclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep piclaw, compare it with