# autoxpose vs coredns

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | autoxpose | coredns |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #25 of 34 in Network Management | #5 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 149 | 14 399 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 8 Oct 2026 | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

coredns scores 76/100 against 43/100 for autoxpose, so it is the safer default.

coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for autoxpose.

coredns is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [autoxpose](https://selfhost.directory/project/autoxpose) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autoxpose.md)
- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autoxpose-vs-coredns