AutoPlexxvszurg-testing
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoPlexx | zurg-testing | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #84 of 118 in Media Server | #47 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 122 | 937 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 7 Aug 2026 | v1.0.0 · 9 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | PowerShell |
Which one should you pick?
zurg-testing scores 54/100 against 45/100 for AutoPlexx, so it is the safer default.
AutoPlexx ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for zurg-testing.
If you want the quickest setup, zurg-testing is easier to run; AutoPlexx needs more configuration.
zurg-testing is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
AutoPlexx details →zurg-testing details →
Swap a project
Keep AutoPlexx, compare it with
Keep zurg-testing, compare it with