automqvsWhisper-WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | Whisper-WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #3 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 10 920 | 2 899 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
automq scores 68/100 against 62/100 for Whisper-WebUI, so it is the safer default.
automq ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whisper-WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Whisper-WebUI is easier to run; automq needs more configuration.
automq is growing faster right now (+62 stars in 30 days).
automq details →Whisper-WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep Whisper-WebUI, compare it with