automqvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 919 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +61 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 29 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for automq.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; automq needs more configuration.
automq details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with