automqvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.
automq ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; automq needs more configuration.
automq is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).
automq details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with