automqvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 | 56 869 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.
automq ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; automq needs more configuration.
automq details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with