automqvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; automq needs more configuration.
automq is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).
automq details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with