# automq vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automq | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 919 | 114 285 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +61 | +3 537 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.

automq ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 537 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automq](https://selfhost.directory/project/automq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automq.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automq-vs-supabase