# automq vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automq | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 | 13 308 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +302 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.

automq ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; automq needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automq](https://selfhost.directory/project/automq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automq.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automq-vs-stash