automqvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 | 35 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +868 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 28 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for automq.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; automq needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).
automq details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with