# automq vs glusterfs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automq | glusterfs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 ✓ | 5 266 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 ✓ | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | C |

## Which one should you pick?

automq scores 68/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.

automq ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.

automq is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automq](https://selfhost.directory/project/automq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automq.md)
- [glusterfs](https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automq-vs-glusterfs