automqvsglusterfs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | glusterfs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 | 5 266 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
automq scores 68/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
automq ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
automq is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).
automq details →glusterfs details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep glusterfs, compare it with