# Automatisch vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Automatisch | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 14 004 ✓ | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +101 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 69/100 for Automatisch, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Automatisch is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Automatisch](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatisch-vs-zammad