AutomatischvsWakupator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Automatisch | Wakupator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Automatisch scores 69/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
Wakupator ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Automatisch.
If you want the quickest setup, Automatisch is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.
Automatisch is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
Automatisch details →Wakupator details →
Swap a project
Keep Automatisch, compare it with
Keep Wakupator, compare it with