# Automatisch vs TypeType

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Automatisch | TypeType |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 ✓ | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Automatisch scores 69/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Automatisch.

If you want the quickest setup, Automatisch is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

Automatisch is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Automatisch](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch.md)
- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatisch-vs-typetype