# Automatisch vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Automatisch | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 | 15 905 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Automatisch and transfer.sh score the same (69/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Automatisch needs more configuration.

Automatisch is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Automatisch](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatisch-vs-transfersh