# Automatisch vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Automatisch | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Automatisch scores 69/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Automatisch needs more configuration.

Automatisch is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Automatisch](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatisch-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana