# Automatisch vs Qtap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Automatisch | Qtap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 ✓ | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Automatisch scores 69/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Automatisch is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.

Automatisch is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Automatisch](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch.md)
- [Qtap](https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatisch-vs-qtap