# Automatisch vs QMReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Automatisch | QMReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 ✓ | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Automatisch scores 69/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.

QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Automatisch.

Automatisch is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Automatisch](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch.md)
- [QMReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatisch-vs-qmreader