# Automatisch vs Qinglong

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Automatisch | Qinglong |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 | 20 027 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 ✓ | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Automatisch and Qinglong score the same (69/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Qinglong ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Automatisch.

If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; Automatisch needs more configuration.

Automatisch is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Automatisch](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch.md)
- [Qinglong](https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatisch-vs-qinglong