# Automatisch vs openstatus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Automatisch | openstatus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 7 in Status Pages |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 ✓ | 9 241 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +99 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Automatisch and openstatus score the same (69/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

If you want the quickest setup, Automatisch is easier to run; openstatus needs more configuration.

openstatus is growing faster right now (+99 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Automatisch](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatisch.md)
- [openstatus](https://selfhost.directory/project/openstatus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openstatus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatisch-vs-openstatus