# automatic-ripping-machine vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 6 522 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 ✓ | +110 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.

If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-zabbix