# automatic-ripping-machine vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 8 654 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

automatic-ripping-machine scores 67/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-workout-cool