# automatic-ripping-machine vs Wagtail

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Wagtail |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 20 594 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 ✓ | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v8.0.1 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Wagtail scores 78/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

Wagtail ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/project/wagtail) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wagtail.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-wagtail)
- [Ghost vs Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-wagtail)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-wagtail