# automatic-ripping-machine vs vLLM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | vLLM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 95 789 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +3 237 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v0.32.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

vLLM scores 91/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for vLLM.

vLLM is growing faster right now (+3 237 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [vLLM](https://selfhost.directory/project/vllm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vllm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-vllm