# automatic-ripping-machine vs Umbraco CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Umbraco CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 ✓ | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-umbraco-cms