# automatic-ripping-machine vs Typesense

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Typesense |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 27 063 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +470 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 ✓ | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Typesense scores 79/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.

If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.

Typesense is growing faster right now (+470 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense.md)

## Related comparisons

- [MeiliSearch vs Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/compare/meilisearch-vs-typesense)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-typesense