# automatic-ripping-machine vs Traefik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 24 in Reverse Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 65 401 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +446 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v2.11.60 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Traefik scores 86/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

Traefik ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

Traefik is growing faster right now (+446 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-traefik