# automatic-ripping-machine vs tidb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | tidb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 40 685 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 ✓ | v8.5.8 · 27 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

tidb scores 80/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for tidb.

If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; tidb needs more configuration.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [tidb](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-tidb