# automatic-ripping-machine vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 47 726 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 ✓ | +19 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.

automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-text-generation-webui