# automatic-ripping-machine vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 95 319 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +2 357 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 357 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-stirling-pdf