# automatic-ripping-machine vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 29 391 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 ✓ | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-srs