# automatic-ripping-machine vs Sonarr

> Two self-hosted [Media Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/media-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Sonarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 17 476 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +979 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Sonarr scores 81/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

Sonarr is growing faster right now (+979 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Sonarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-sonarr