# automatic-ripping-machine vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 45 679 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +840 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-sentry