# automatic-ripping-machine vs rsyslog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | rsyslog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 ✓ | 2 344 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

automatic-ripping-machine and rsyslog score the same (67/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.

If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.

automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [rsyslog](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-rsyslog