# automatic-ripping-machine vs PhotoPrism

> Two self-hosted [Media Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/media-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | PhotoPrism |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 40 373 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 ✓ | +138 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-photoprism