# automatic-ripping-machine vs Payload CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Payload CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 13 in Headless CMS |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 45 565 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +653 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v3.92.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Payload CMS scores 83/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

Payload CMS ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

Payload CMS is growing faster right now (+653 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-payload-cms)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-payload-cms